Boo Hoo !!!!

A number of Democratic Party sychophants have been accussing the Ferris Wharton Campaign of "Negative Campaigning. Before I go any farther, I believe that it is necessary to clarify the meaning of this term.

To most of us the term Negative Campaigning suggests playing dirty, lying about a candidate, spinning and twisting his record, repeating old failures that have nothing to do with the candidates current character of ability to do an excellent job for his constitutients..

But to the Democrats the term Negative Campaigning denotes the exposure to the voters of a Democrat's record that involves failure, gross incompetance, dishonesty, or a low morale character that will negatively effect his or her job performance. In other words true stuff that the voters need to know before pulling the lever. It's considered negative only because it gives the voters the opportunity to see what they are really going to get from the man or woman representing the jackass party, not jackass the movie, although one could make the argument ...... (The donkey is their symbol ..... it's no accident)

Recently the fact that Beau Biden only tried three cases as a U.S. attorney has come to light as well as his flunking the Delaware Bar Exam 3 times. Now the voters have been informed that Beau's carelessness blew one of the 3 cases that his superiors dared to trust him with.

Democrats are crying foul not because the public doesn't have a right to know but because Ferris Wharton's excellent character and record doesn't afford them with the same opportunity. Do you really think that the Democrats would hold back if they had any negative information of Ferris Wharton ? If you do, I have a bridge that I'd like to sell you.

What's really the icing on the cake for me, is hearing that little toad and former Attorney General of our State, Charlie Oberlie crying foul and acting like he has any credibility in this matter. That diminutive dirt bag will always have a special place in my heart for the following reason :

My cousin's husband was on his way home one spring evening from picking up some parts for his car at PEP boys, when he was killed, litterally broadsided by a car driven by a snivelling little punk whose parent were big shots in the State Democratic Party. The little delinquent wasn't just juiced up on multiple cans of beer, he was flying under the influence of some kind of chemical that he had been inhaling, the empty cannisters were in his vehicle. The little crumb's parents who were out of the country on vacation, left this little creep alone eventhough he had been involved in previous driving under the influence incidents and had often exhibited substance abuse behavior. Anyway after this kid broadsided and murdered my cousin's husband, he managed to get a call through to Charlie Oberely who arrived on the scene within minutes. Charlie even beat the police to the acccident scene (I wonder if he was speeding) and helped the little punk avoid the testing that would have showed not only his degree of alchohol intoxication but also provided the time for the effect of the inhalents to dissapate. Whenever I hear that little toad (Charlie O) acting like he has the moral authority to address any issue invlving fairness or morality I feel like vomiting and when that feeling passes I break into laughter.